
That's pretty much what the
Knicks are trying to tell all of the rabid fans who lashed out over the blockbuster trade for Carmelo Anthony. Although trading for a top 10 NBA superstar seems like a no-
brainer to any sane B-ball fanatic, you have to question the judgment of the Knickerbockers when they trade more than half of their future for a scoring phenom.
Carmelo Anthony is a perennial superstar, and the
Knicks are sure to turn some heads in the league whenever someone faces off against him and the athletic juggernaut that is
Amare Stoudemire, but this trade leaves them far short of being a contender in the Eastern conference which is arguably dominated by four teams (Celtics, Heat, Magic, and now the Bulls). While
Melo gives them another option to outscore their opponents by even larger margins, the
Knicks now lack sufficient depth, which is a cornerstone of any championship team (look at how deep Boston and San Antonio's line-ups are and how much time their bench players get). I'm glad that they kept the blossoming Landry Fields, but the loss of other role players could be crucial to any legitimate title run.
Felton adapted to the
D'Antoni system and was running
Amare's signature pick-roll better than any PG not named Steve Nash or
Deron Williams;
Gallinari is touted as a poor man's Dirk and certainly could shoot like it; Chandler, though an enigma, can put up double digits every game and was still learning how to be consistent; even
Mozgov was finally finding a groove. Mr. Big Shot came with the
Melo package, but he is in the twilight of his career and will not be as happy having moved from his hometown that he had grown accustomed to living (and eventually retiring) in.
Though, reports are that the
Knicks are vying to woo either
CP3 or
Deron Williams in the next two summers, which would complete the triangle needed to win a chip. But this is all speculation and left up to the results of the daunting collective bargaining agreement coming up. The
Knicks' prospects could all be playing in Turkey with Allen
Iverson if that doesn't pan out.
Now to move the conversation to something more nuanced: is anyone else just a bit alarmed at the
NBA's star movement in the past few years? While Republicans on Capitol Hill try to move power away from the federal government, it seems that the ghost of George
Steinbrenner has
possesed GM's and players in the NBA and forced star power to become centralized. No longer do we see just one star player moving to a major franchise
chasing money changing it's fortunes by getting them out of the first round of the playoffs. We are witnessing the real-life formation of the Justice League, as the best players join to conquer the forces of evil and steal all of the prime-time TV for their franchises!
Just look at the teams: The Big Three in Boston (now the Old Three), the New Big Three in Miami, Kobe and
Pau, now
Melo and STAT! Even old vets who still have some fight in them are aligning with star players (think the Mavericks, the Magic, even the Suns). We are seeing a shift from superstars running their own teams, with role-players to compliment them, to teams emptying their depth charts and coffers just to get a
chance at a championship.
But what does this mean for sub-par franchises? Who is really going to care about that Kings-Bobcats match-up? When will America's preeminent cities stop clamoring for the lone superstars in smaller franchises? Blake Griffin may still be in LA in the future, but don't be surprised if he's clad in purple and gold. This is just a warning.